BCG’s Competing for Advantage

The Global Advantage Diamond from BCG looks useful to diagnose competitive advantage in rapidly developing economies (RDEs). It maps four issues – market access, resource access, local adaptation and network coordination – to produce a diamond map relative strengths of you and competitors.  Read more

Bookmark and Share

Business’s key role in climate change

Shocking to hear from a former strategy advisor to the UK Prime Minister that neither current nor future Governments are likely to do anything serious about climate change because most MPs ‘don’t believe’ in it. I’m reminded of an observation by Dennis Meadows – that the public have a long-term interest, but no resources to drive change, and politicians have the resources to act, but only a short-term focus on the next election. Only the business community has both the long-term concern and the resources to do something, and many are already doing so, in spite of positively obstructive government policies.

[ Incidentally, do not be surprised to see me comment on climate change as if it is proven beyond reasonable doubt, extremely serious, and needs to be acted upon hard - which makes it a major issue for corporate strategy. (See other posts on sustainability, notably from MIT's SLoan management Review.) Whilst politicians are happy to express strong views on issues they don't understand, I only express views on issues I do understand sufficiently to comment. Most MPs lack even the basic scientific skill to have an informed opinion on climate change - and the same is likely true of most politicians in other countries. I accept entirely that some who have taken the trouble to investigate and understand the mechanisms at work may come to a different view, but the vast majority of people sufficiently competent to have an opinion are in clear agreement. ]

Bookmark and Share

Spreadsheets no good for strategy

This blog post from HBS starts well, but ends in the wrong place, saying we shouldn’t try to quantify intangible issues. We do know how to deal quantitatively with such factors. We can handle both tangible qualities that differ between people, such as differing customer sales rates, and also intangible states-of-mind. A bank tracks ‘miserable moments’ their customers experience and knows well how recent history of those problems affects the likelihood of customers leaving. Call center companies know how workload pressures affect staff morale, productivity and turnover, and so on. Applying ‘artistry’ to the issue, as argued in this article, is not the answer. It is right, though, that you can’t do this with spreadsheet analysis – it can’t handle the interdependencies. The basics are explained in summaries from my book on attributes and state-of-mind intangibles. I can also recommend How to Measure Anything by Douglas Hubbard.

More at www.strategydynamics.com and strategy dynamics on LinkedIn.

Bookmark and Share

Strategy error by Kraft?

Kraft foods finally won control of Cadbury with a big £11.9 billion ($19.4b) offer. Warren Buffet, owner of 9% of Kraft, says it’s a bad deal – and he’s rarely wrong. Will Kraft do the usual and try to extract ’synergies’ by slashing costs, or deliver real value by leveraging the combined resources to drive medium- to long-term growth in cash flows? … and will analysts allow them to do it right?

Bookmark and Share

What MBAs want

Encouraging interview with Blair Sheppard, dean of Duke Business School, about increasingly mature expectations of future execuitves [their MBAs!] Seems they are looking for broader perspectives, linking business issues to societal and environmental issues, and not thinking the answer is to junk existing institutions but to make them work better. Blair says this needs better integration between schools of Business, Environment and Policy. We are not starting in a good place - though he claims business schools are already ‘interdisciplinary’ [i.e. they have all the required subjects], that’s not actually the case because they lack the tools to integrate them, even if they have the desire to do so.

Bookmark and Share

The Execution Premium

More solid stuff from Kaplan and Norton, which moves on somewhat from their balanced scorecard + strategy maps ideas. The Execution Premium points out “Strategy that does not link to operations is not strategic. It’s just pointless planning.” and goes on to outline how to plan operations to deliver the strategy – a notable omission from most business school strategy classes.

Bookmark and Share

Why Most CEOs Are Bad at Strategy

A blog post by Roger Martin* makes a good case that CEOs find it hard to simultaneously make a good choice of where to play and how to win. He concludes they need to go beyond these basics and ‘creatively integrate’ these two views. True enough if performance were all about formulating strategy, but it forgets that order-of-magnitude differences in performance more often arise from relentless expert management of strategy, than from unique choices of where+how to play. 

He also claims that we do not have the tools to integrate these perspectives – which is not true, of course, because that’s what strategy dynamics does.

* Dean of the Rotman School of Management

Bookmark and Share

Speed up clean-tech adoption

A Chatham House report calls for policy makers to cut radically the time for clean technologies to be implemented. Even when technically and financially attractive, adoption takes decades. This can be changed – a big strategic opportunity for firms in relevant sectors, as well as massively important to society - see my note. Read more

Bookmark and Share

Green strategy potential

In Green Is a Strategy, strategy+business makes a strong case that sustainability is becoming, not a nuisance issue to which business will have to react, so much as an opportunity for advantage that needs to be proactively grasped. Read more

Bookmark and Share

Which CEOs to admire?

It seems the real hero-CEOs are not the well-known names, and perhaps not with well-known companies either. In Do We Celebrate the Wrong CEOs? Morten Hansen and Herminia Ibarra identify CEOs who have delivered sustained, long-term growth in investor returns over long periods, and it’s likely you never heard of most. More worrying – maybe the companies they run are not well documented either, nor what has been so great about the strategic management that delivered these great results.

Bookmark and Share

Next Page »